History of Modern Science, Galileo and Newton Essay

History of Modern Science, Galileo and Newton - Essay Example Here in this paper, both are discussed; compared and analyzed in a deep manner as per their respective works which brought about a significant change within our modern day luxuries that mankind has in the present times. Galileo was born on 15th February 1564 and is widely regarded as an Italian physicist, astronomer, mathematician and philosopher of repute. He had a major hand in bringing about the scientific revolution within history. His name is synonymous with the very best in the world of innovators, physicists and thinkers since he was, is and will always remain a genius. Mankind owes a lot of gratitude to the personality of Galileo and hence the reason that he is still remembered as a hero notwithstanding a great amount of time has passed since he died – on 8th January 1642. Galileo brought to the fore his achievements in the line of improvements that he made towards the working domains of the telescope as well as the consequent astronomical observations with added support for the sake of Copernicanism. Without a doubt, this formed the basis as to why he was regarded as the "father of modern observational astronomy", the "father of modern physics", â€Å"the father of Modern Scienceâ €  and the "father of science." Galileo studied the motion of uniformly accelerated objects which is usually there in all school and college curricula. The physics courses have special mention of such objects and it comes especially under the heading of kinematics. Galileo made contributions towards the field of observational astronomy which has entailed within it the discovery of the four largest satellites that Jupiter has and named as the Galilean moons. This was so done to give him honor and respect for his work. He also studied the sunspots, firstly made an observation regarding them and then analyzing them in the end. Further, he worked tirelessly towards the related fields of applied science and technology. (Shea & Artigas, 2003) On the other hand, Sir

Primus Sales Force Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Primus Sales Force Case Study - Essay Example ases, the participant might not have received enough correct communication from their supervisor, colleagues or even their customers; however, one is left with the overarching question of what constitutes the right amount of communication. The question did not perform what the result indicated. The consequence was that participants had no idea what they were being ranked by or because misled by phony or inaccurate contents of the question. Otherwise, the question did not give enough information to define the alignment of correct versus incorrect. Due to the fact that different people would have their own judgment or personal value to treat similar issues, without a proper and well-explained definition about the right amount as the standard, every participant would make their own definition to consider about the right amount for them. As a result, the incorrect feedback only wasted valuable time and created corresponding costs. This ultimately led to the failure of the survey. Accordi ng to Baldwin & Garvey, â€Å"The essential information necessary to obtain a correct solution in these subtasks was comprised of four attributes. The communications were scored according to the presence of explicit encoding of this information† (1973, p. 44). If participants could not encode the information clearly, they did not get the correct information they should get. Hence they could not give the correct feedback from the survey questions. From the survey questions, the main focus was with regards to the attitudes that the respondents had. By seeking to engage this metric, the researchers were mostly interested in measuring the impact on attitudes and behaviors that were reflected on the employees after the survey questions. For example, a level of useful information for the sales work from company magazines and intranet portals was provided a level of importance as compared to the communication for the employees’ sales and level of satisfaction from communication within